[ PARENT ]

EDIT :: resolution.py

from __future__ import annotations import collections import itertools import operator from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Generic from ..structs import ( CT, KT, RT, DirectedGraph, IterableView, IteratorMapping, RequirementInformation, State, build_iter_view, ) from .abstract import AbstractResolver, Result from .criterion import Criterion from .exceptions import ( InconsistentCandidate, RequirementsConflicted, ResolutionImpossible, ResolutionTooDeep, ResolverException, ) if TYPE_CHECKING: from collections.abc import Collection, Iterable, Mapping from ..providers import AbstractProvider, Preference from ..reporters import BaseReporter _OPTIMISTIC_BACKJUMPING_RATIO: float = 0.1 def _build_result(state: State[RT, CT, KT]) -> Result[RT, CT, KT]: mapping = state.mapping all_keys: dict[int, KT | None] = {id(v): k for k, v in mapping.items()} all_keys[id(None)] = None graph: DirectedGraph[KT | None] = DirectedGraph() graph.add(None) # Sentinel as root dependencies' parent. connected: set[KT | None] = {None} for key, criterion in state.criteria.items(): if not _has_route_to_root(state.criteria, key, all_keys, connected): continue if key not in graph: graph.add(key) for p in criterion.iter_parent(): try: pkey = all_keys[id(p)] except KeyError: continue if pkey not in graph: graph.add(pkey) graph.connect(pkey, key) return Result( mapping={k: v for k, v in mapping.items() if k in connected}, graph=graph, criteria=state.criteria, ) class Resolution(Generic[RT, CT, KT]): """Stateful resolution object. This is designed as a one-off object that holds information to kick start the resolution process, and holds the results afterwards. """ def __init__( self, provider: AbstractProvider[RT, CT, KT], reporter: BaseReporter[RT, CT, KT], ) -> None: self._p = provider self._r = reporter self._states: list[State[RT, CT, KT]] = [] # Optimistic backjumping variables self._optimistic_backjumping_ratio = _OPTIMISTIC_BACKJUMPING_RATIO self._save_states: list[State[RT, CT, KT]] | None = None self._optimistic_start_round: int | None = None @property def state(self) -> State[RT, CT, KT]: try: return self._states[-1] except IndexError as e: raise AttributeError("state") from e def _push_new_state(self) -> None: """Push a new state into history. This new state will be used to hold resolution results of the next coming round. """ base = self._states[-1] state = State( mapping=base.mapping.copy(), criteria=base.criteria.copy(), backtrack_causes=base.backtrack_causes[:], ) self._states.append(state) def _add_to_criteria( self, criteria: dict[KT, Criterion[RT, CT]], requirement: RT, parent: CT | None, ) -> None: self._r.adding_requirement(requirement=requirement, parent=parent) identifier = self._p.identify(requirement_or_candidate=requirement) criterion = criteria.get(identifier) if criterion: incompatibilities = list(criterion.incompatibilities) else: incompatibilities = [] matches = self._p.find_matches( identifier=identifier, requirements=IteratorMapping( criteria, operator.methodcaller("iter_requirement"), {identifier: [requirement]}, ), incompatibilities=IteratorMapping( criteria, operator.attrgetter("incompatibilities"), {identifier: incompatibilities}, ), ) if criterion: information = list(criterion.information) information.append(RequirementInformation(requirement, parent)) else: information = [RequirementInformation(requirement, parent)] criterion = Criterion( candidates=build_iter_view(matches), information=information, incompatibilities=incompatibilities, ) if not criterion.candidates: raise RequirementsConflicted(criterion) criteria[identifier] = criterion def _remove_information_from_criteria( self, criteria: dict[KT, Criterion[RT, CT]], parents: Collection[KT] ) -> None: """Remove information from parents of criteria. Concretely, removes all values from each criterion's ``information`` field that have one of ``parents`` as provider of the requirement. :param criteria: The criteria to update. :param parents: Identifiers for which to remove information from all criteria. """ if not parents: return for key, criterion in criteria.items(): criteria[key] = Criterion( criterion.candidates, [ information for information in criterion.information if ( information.parent is None or self._p.identify(information.parent) not in parents ) ], criterion.incompatibilities, ) def _get_preference(self, name: KT) -> Preference: return self._p.get_preference( identifier=name, resolutions=self.state.mapping, candidates=IteratorMapping( self.state.criteria, operator.attrgetter("candidates"), ), information=IteratorMapping( self.state.criteria, operator.attrgetter("information"), ), backtrack_causes=self.state.backtrack_causes, ) def _is_current_pin_satisfying( self, name: KT, criterion: Criterion[RT, CT] ) -> bool: try: current_pin = self.state.mapping[name] except KeyError: return False return all( self._p.is_satisfied_by(requirement=r, candidate=current_pin) for r in criterion.iter_requirement() ) def _get_updated_criteria(self, candidate: CT) -> dict[KT, Criterion[RT, CT]]: criteria = self.state.criteria.copy() for requirement in self._p.get_dependencies(candidate=candidate): self._add_to_criteria(criteria, requirement, parent=candidate) return criteria def _attempt_to_pin_criterion(self, name: KT) -> list[Criterion[RT, CT]]: criterion = self.state.criteria[name] causes: list[Criterion[RT, CT]] = [] for candidate in criterion.candidates: try: criteria = self._get_updated_criteria(candidate) except RequirementsConflicted as e: self._r.rejecting_candidate(e.criterion, candidate) causes.append(e.criterion) continue # Check the newly-pinned candidate actually works. This should # always pass under normal circumstances, but in the case of a # faulty provider, we will raise an error to notify the implementer # to fix find_matches() and/or is_satisfied_by(). satisfied = all( self._p.is_satisfied_by(requirement=r, candidate=candidate) for r in criterion.iter_requirement() ) if not satisfied: raise InconsistentCandidate(candidate, criterion) self._r.pinning(candidate=candidate) self.state.criteria.update(criteria) # Put newly-pinned candidate at the end. This is essential because # backtracking looks at this mapping to get the last pin. self.state.mapping.pop(name, None) self.state.mapping[name] = candidate return [] # All candidates tried, nothing works. This criterion is a dead # end, signal for backtracking. return causes def _patch_criteria( self, incompatibilities_from_broken: list[tuple[KT, list[CT]]] ) -> bool: # Create a new state from the last known-to-work one, and apply # the previously gathered incompatibility information. for k, incompatibilities in incompatibilities_from_broken: if not incompatibilities: continue try: criterion = self.state.criteria[k] except KeyError: continue matches = self._p.find_matches( identifier=k, requirements=IteratorMapping( self.state.criteria, operator.methodcaller("iter_requirement"), ), incompatibilities=IteratorMapping( self.state.criteria, operator.attrgetter("incompatibilities"), {k: incompatibilities}, ), ) candidates: IterableView[CT] = build_iter_view(matches) if not candidates: return False incompatibilities.extend(criterion.incompatibilities) self.state.criteria[k] = Criterion( candidates=candidates, information=list(criterion.information), incompatibilities=incompatibilities, ) return True def _save_state(self) -> None: """Save states for potential rollback if optimistic backjumping fails.""" if self._save_states is None: self._save_states = [ State( mapping=s.mapping.copy(), criteria=s.criteria.copy(), backtrack_causes=s.backtrack_causes[:], ) for s in self._states ] def _rollback_states(self) -> None: """Rollback states and disable optimistic backjumping.""" self._optimistic_backjumping_ratio = 0.0 if self._save_states: self._states = self._save_states self._save_states = None def _backjump(self, causes: list[RequirementInformation[RT, CT]]) -> bool: """Perform backjumping. When we enter here, the stack is like this:: [ state Z ] [ state Y ] [ state X ] .... earlier states are irrelevant. 1. No pins worked for Z, so it does not have a pin. 2. We want to reset state Y to unpinned, and pin another candidate. 3. State X holds what state Y was before the pin, but does not have the incompatibility information gathered in state Y. Each iteration of the loop will: 1. Identify Z. The incompatibility is not always caused by the latest state. For example, given three requirements A, B and C, with dependencies A1, B1 and C1, where A1 and B1 are incompatible: the last state might be related to C, so we want to discard the previous state. 2. Discard Z. 3. Discard Y but remember its incompatibility information gathered previously, and the failure we're dealing with right now. 4. Push a new state Y' based on X, and apply the incompatibility information from Y to Y'. 5a. If this causes Y' to conflict, we need to backtrack again. Make Y' the new Z and go back to step 2. 5b. If the incompatibilities apply cleanly, end backtracking. """ incompatible_reqs: Iterable[CT | RT] = itertools.chain( (c.parent for c in causes if c.parent is not None), (c.requirement for c in causes), ) incompatible_deps = {self._p.identify(r) for r in incompatible_reqs} while len(self._states) >= 3: # Remove the state that triggered backtracking. del self._states[-1] # Optimistically backtrack to a state that caused the incompatibility broken_state = self.state while True: # Retrieve the last candidate pin and known incompatibilities. try: broken_state = self._states.pop() name, candidate = broken_state.mapping.popitem() except (IndexError, KeyError): raise ResolutionImpossible(causes) from None if ( not self._optimistic_backjumping_ratio and name not in incompatible_deps ): # For safe backjumping only backjump if the current dependency # is not the same as the incompatible dependency break # On the first time a non-safe backjump is done the state # is saved so we can restore it later if the resolution fails if ( self._optimistic_backjumping_ratio and self._save_states is None and name not in incompatible_deps ): self._save_state() # If the current dependencies and the incompatible dependencies # are overlapping then we have likely found a cause of the # incompatibility current_dependencies = { self._p.identify(d) for d in self._p.get_dependencies(candidate) } if not current_dependencies.isdisjoint(incompatible_deps): break # Fallback: We should not backtrack to the point where # broken_state.mapping is empty, so stop backtracking for # a chance for the resolution to recover if not broken_state.mapping: break # Guard: We need at least two state to remain to both # backtrack and push a new state if len(self._states) <= 1: raise ResolutionImpossible(causes) incompatibilities_from_broken = [ (k, list(v.incompatibilities)) for k, v in broken_state.criteria.items() ] # Also mark the newly known incompatibility. incompatibilities_from_broken.append((name, [candidate])) self._push_new_state() success = self._patch_criteria(incompatibilities_from_broken) # It works! Let's work on this new state. if success: return True # State does not work after applying known incompatibilities. # Try the still previous state. # No way to backtrack anymore. return False def _extract_causes( self, criteron: list[Criterion[RT, CT]] ) -> list[RequirementInformation[RT, CT]]: """Extract causes from list of criterion and deduplicate""" return list({id(i): i for c in criteron for i in c.information}.values()) def resolve(self, requirements: Iterable[RT], max_rounds: int) -> State[RT, CT, KT]: if self._states: raise RuntimeError("already resolved") self._r.starting() # Initialize the root state. self._states = [ State( mapping=collections.OrderedDict(), criteria={}, backtrack_causes=[], ) ] for r in requirements: try: self._add_to_criteria(self.state.criteria, r, parent=None) except RequirementsConflicted as e: raise ResolutionImpossible(e.criterion.information) from e # The root state is saved as a sentinel so the first ever pin can have # something to backtrack to if it fails. The root state is basically # pinning the virtual "root" package in the graph. self._push_new_state() # Variables for optimistic backjumping optimistic_rounds_cutoff: int | None = None optimistic_backjumping_start_round: int | None = None for round_index in range(max_rounds): self._r.starting_round(index=round_index) # Handle if optimistic backjumping has been running for too long if self._optimistic_backjumping_ratio and self._save_states is not None: if optimistic_backjumping_start_round is None: optimistic_backjumping_start_round = round_index optimistic_rounds_cutoff = int( (max_rounds - round_index) * self._optimistic_backjumping_ratio ) if optimistic_rounds_cutoff <= 0: self._rollback_states() continue elif optimistic_rounds_cutoff is not None: if ( round_index - optimistic_backjumping_start_round >= optimistic_rounds_cutoff ): self._rollback_states() continue unsatisfied_names = [ key for key, criterion in self.state.criteria.items() if not self._is_current_pin_satisfying(key, criterion) ] # All criteria are accounted for. Nothing more to pin, we are done! if not unsatisfied_names: self._r.ending(state=self.state) return self.state # keep track of satisfied names to calculate diff after pinning satisfied_names = set(self.state.criteria.keys()) - set(unsatisfied_names) if len(unsatisfied_names) > 1: narrowed_unstatisfied_names = list( self._p.narrow_requirement_selection( identifiers=unsatisfied_names, resolutions=self.state.mapping, candidates=IteratorMapping( self.state.criteria, operator.attrgetter("candidates"), ), information=IteratorMapping( self.state.criteria, operator.attrgetter("information"), ), backtrack_causes=self.state.backtrack_causes, ) ) else: narrowed_unstatisfied_names = unsatisfied_names # If there are no unsatisfied names use unsatisfied names if not narrowed_unstatisfied_names: raise RuntimeError("narrow_requirement_selection returned 0 names") # If there is only 1 unsatisfied name skip calling self._get_preference if len(narrowed_unstatisfied_names) > 1: # Choose the most preferred unpinned criterion to try. name = min(narrowed_unstatisfied_names, key=self._get_preference) else: name = narrowed_unstatisfied_names[0] failure_criterion = self._attempt_to_pin_criterion(name) if failure_criterion: causes = self._extract_causes(failure_criterion) # Backjump if pinning fails. The backjump process puts us in # an unpinned state, so we can work on it in the next round. self._r.resolving_conflicts(causes=causes) try: success = self._backjump(causes) except ResolutionImpossible: if self._optimistic_backjumping_ratio and self._save_states: failed_optimistic_backjumping = True else: raise else: failed_optimistic_backjumping = bool( not success and self._optimistic_backjumping_ratio and self._save_states ) if failed_optimistic_backjumping and self._save_states: self._rollback_states() else: self.state.backtrack_causes[:] = causes # Dead ends everywhere. Give up. if not success: raise ResolutionImpossible(self.state.backtrack_causes) else: # discard as information sources any invalidated names # (unsatisfied names that were previously satisfied) newly_unsatisfied_names = { key for key, criterion in self.state.criteria.items() if key in satisfied_names and not self._is_current_pin_satisfying(key, criterion) } self._remove_information_from_criteria( self.state.criteria, newly_unsatisfied_names ) # Pinning was successful. Push a new state to do another pin. self._push_new_state() self._r.ending_round(index=round_index, state=self.state) raise ResolutionTooDeep(max_rounds) class Resolver(AbstractResolver[RT, CT, KT]): """The thing that performs the actual resolution work.""" base_exception = ResolverException def resolve( # type: ignore[override] self, requirements: Iterable[RT], max_rounds: int = 100, ) -> Result[RT, CT, KT]: """Take a collection of constraints, spit out the resolution result. The return value is a representation to the final resolution result. It is a tuple subclass with three public members: * `mapping`: A dict of resolved candidates. Each key is an identifier of a requirement (as returned by the provider's `identify` method), and the value is the resolved candidate. * `graph`: A `DirectedGraph` instance representing the dependency tree. The vertices are keys of `mapping`, and each edge represents *why* a particular package is included. A special vertex `None` is included to represent parents of user-supplied requirements. * `criteria`: A dict of "criteria" that hold detailed information on how edges in the graph are derived. Each key is an identifier of a requirement, and the value is a `Criterion` instance. The following exceptions may be raised if a resolution cannot be found: * `ResolutionImpossible`: A resolution cannot be found for the given combination of requirements. The `causes` attribute of the exception is a list of (requirement, parent), giving the requirements that could not be satisfied. * `ResolutionTooDeep`: The dependency tree is too deeply nested and the resolver gave up. This is usually caused by a circular dependency, but you can try to resolve this by increasing the `max_rounds` argument. """ resolution = Resolution(self.provider, self.reporter) state = resolution.resolve(requirements, max_rounds=max_rounds) return _build_result(state) def _has_route_to_root( criteria: Mapping[KT, Criterion[RT, CT]], key: KT | None, all_keys: dict[int, KT | None], connected: set[KT | None], ) -> bool: if key in connected: return True if key not in criteria: return False assert key is not None for p in criteria[key].iter_parent(): try: pkey = all_keys[id(p)] except KeyError: continue if pkey in connected: connected.add(key) return True if _has_route_to_root(criteria, pkey, all_keys, connected): connected.add(key) return True return False

SAVE CANCEL